check at:  noevidence@gov.org

Here is evidence:

http://www.aerotoxic.org

http://www.toxiccabinair.com/cms/home.html

http://www.gcaqe.org

Advice to UK Government: Keep looking & never give up!

Remember it’s kids and politicians health too…..

No.

Until Governments, Airlines and Aircraft manufacturers grasp this basic responsibility and     stop – God help us.

One would imagine that someone, somewhere could make money out of clean air and not poisoning customers and crews?

Enter the Boeing 787 Dreamliner! Note FRESH AIR INLET at wing root, next to red light. WELL DONE BOEING – THAT IS CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY!

Here is an Airbus A 380 – note lack of FRESH AIR INLET at wing root. THAT IS NOT CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY – A MISTAKE AIRBUS?

Who care$? Everybody who enjoy$ FRE$H AIR……..& money?

They prefer to protect polar bears and newts, but if you are a human – forget it.

So let’s see how the German Green party views aerotoxicity – the technical problem which has solutions, but only when people are told about them.

Here is the German Green party position in a badly translated press Statement:

Mark Tressel MP
Spokesman for Tourism Policy
the parliamentary group of Alliance 90/The Greens
Contact: Soren Storm,
Platz der Republik 1, 11011 Berlin
K (030) 227-73204, M (030) 227-76206
 markus.tressel.ma02@bundestag.de

 
Improve cabin air in aircraft                                25 January 2012
Committee debated the request of the Greens
On Wednesday, 25 January has the Committee on Transport, Building and
Urban development on the request of the Greens “contaminated cabin air
prevent in-flight “(Bundestag 17/7480) debated. More
always absent in the federal government to recognize that it is a
major health risk for the crew and passengers
These aircraft. It also short-term solutions would be implemented.
In the recent past, the information on incidents caused by contaminated
Cabin air in aircraft multiplied. There is a danger at worst neurological
Outages. The reason is, among other things, the technical design of many
Aircraft, which draws off the “fresh air” for the cabin from the engines (bleed air mechanism).
“Only one logical expertise says that this is not without
Problems can take place, “said Mark Tressel, tourism spokesman
the Green parliamentary group. Came to the realization of this right
Coalition for the hearing of 21 September 2011. Nothing is done yet.
The industry is evasive, appease airlines and the federal government is silent
the problem is hopelessly overburdened and heavily influenced by the lobby.
She’s hiding behind the argument that it is a bad smell
and there is no health hazard. Numerous studies
diagnoses and speak a different language. Tressel recently achieved test results,
that a variety of harmful substances mitfliegt.
“We look for deeds and time demands include a federal government that
actively contributes to international level and tries to solve the clues,
For example, by independent investigations by the Federal Institute for
Risk assessment, “says Tressel continues. In addition, the use of CPT-pure
Engine oils and facilitates the installation of measuring and control systems for
hazardous substances are promoted. The Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation
need their skills (including financial) to expand. Counter-financed
This is cut in funding by the Federal Aviation Authority and an increase
revenue through consistent sanctions for violations of applicable
Law (for non-notification and omission of information and support services).
Tressel concluded: “In the long term is the only solution that
Aircraft manufacturers bring the technology away from the bleed air mechanism is used.
A positive example is the principle of the RAM Air Boeing Dreamliner
(787), in which the air no longer comes from the engines. “

So Green Party – please forget the politics of flying and help protect your fellow GREEN MEMBERS – you have a duty of care….

Thank you to the German Green Party - again, for using ‘freedom of speech’ in your Parliament.

Any chance of explaining it to GREEN PARTIES in other countries?

Put simple: ‘Humans (and polar bears) breathing toxic oil fumes makes people ill’.

Danke!

DAVID LEARMOUNT who has written for Flight international since Pontius was a pilot is an AEROTOXIC hero for:

 1. Denying any knowledge of the issue.

2. Listening and looking at the evidence.

3. Changing his mind.

4. Having the courage to write about AEROTOXIC IN THE INDUSTRY MAGAZINE about what he discovered.

David you are a true gentleman, hero and gifted writer.

ps. Can you please include the key word ‘Aerotoxic’ somewhere in your next article?

You have the total respect of the Aerotoxic Association – you deserve a medal, as you recognise we are all working towards KNOWN SOLUTIONS FOR A KNOWN PROBLEM.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam’s_razor

So why Zebra’s?

“when you are in Texas and you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras.”

Zebra is a medical slang term for a surprising diagnosis.

Hyperventilation is a baffling diagnosis for Aerotoxic syndrome.

QED.

However Hyperventilation has never been linked with breathing toxic oil fumes in a confined space.

But the important thing is that this unlikely medical condition puts the ‘blame’ on the individual – rather than the oil fumes. Some of the symptoms overlap, as with any medical condition. That’s how they want it.

Meanwhile: Hypocri$y is the state of pretending to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that one does not actually have. Hypocrisy involves the deception of others and is thus a kind of lie.

^{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy}

^{So next time a ‘doctor’ diagnoses you with ‘Hyperventilation’ – be sure to ask him or her –}

^{‘Are you ab$olutely po$itively $ure, Doctor?’} 

^{Perhaps they are suffering from Hyperventilation attack$….}

^{Indu$try Doctor’$ mantra: ‘There is no evidence….’}

^{It’s all deeply embarrassing…But how do they continue to get away with it?}

Nobody in their right mind would suggest that he ran his ship aground -deliberately?

How is it that over 30 UK airline pilots have been grounded due to toxic air fumes – whilst few ‘doctors’ have the moral integrity to believe them about the cause?

So does society believe professional’s when it suits and crucifies them when it doesn’t?

Good luck Captain Schettino – you made a mistake and now you must suffer.

And to all the aircrew Captains who are suffering from toxic air exposure – just go away and keep quiet, otherwise you will upset society with some inconvenient facts….

Drugs, chemicals and nothing to worry about!

“Boss I’ve found Tri Cresyl Phosphate in this athlete who flew in from overseas and was in a ‘fume event’ flight…..”

“Er well…… as TCP has no known dangerous effects -  it doesn’t matter – forget you ever found it.”

“But boss, this athlete is complaining of jet lag type symptoms and has withdrawn from the games – sick.”

“er well……… according to Cranfield University there is no danger from breathing toxic oil fumes in a confined space – so PLEASE forget it!’

“OK boss, but I’ve just found TCP in your blood too…..”

Boss: “er……I just don’t feel well – OK! – Next athlete! Now if we find a banned chemical / drug in you, you do realise you will never compete again and will be fined? This abuse of chemicals  is VERY serious….”

Athlete: “How elastic are your goal posts?”

Boss “Very….”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16626082

Dr Watson (Jude Law) Cleans up!

 So wealthy actor Jude Law has won ‘damages’ of £130K (plus costs) for having his electric telephone ‘hacked’.

Poor thing!

So how much do people poisoned on planes get?

Well, an Australian stewardess got $140K in 2010 after 18 years in the ‘Law’ Courts.

http://www.aerotoxic.org/news-and-articles/482-east-west-airlines-v-turner-appeal-dismissed

And how much have the countless other victims got after being poisoned?

Zilch.

But one has to remember that it’s only poisoning and NOT the serious offence of phone hacking, so that’s OK.

Well done Jude ‘Law’ - but on your next ‘fume event’ flight – good luck!

Sherlock Holmes: ‘Dr Watson – what’s that smell?’

‘Nothing to worry about Sherlock – the UK Government says it’s…………. safe!’

Sherlock Holmes: ”Please don’t insult my intelligence!”